Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-21 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > profile files and desktop files are useless for tideEditor because: > > * HFILE_PATH should be under wher user has write access (For example, > > HFILE_PATH=/usr/share/xtide/harminocs-????.tcd tideEditor > > immediately exits). > > * tideEditor surely requires HFILE_PATH environ. With no HFILE_PATH > > environ, this cannot be launched. > > Hrm. A wrapper which sets HFILE_PATH to the argument would be > better. And even better a file choser for tideEditor when no > HFILE_PATH and no arg is set. copy tcd file to /tmp when invoked (with no arg specified)? Some wrapper script to change ENV to arg as you said is preferable anyway. Well, is there a way to pass a argument (in general) to binary when called by desktop files (icon in panel)? > > > > Well, when I directly use release number, i.e. > > tcd-utils: 1.3.7-1 2 3 4 5 ... > > xtide versioning become > > 2.9-dev 0.1.dev 0.2.dev.. 0.3.dev.. 0.4.dev.. > > (then formal release) 5 (suddenly jump) > > Why 5? Why not 1? The version/release of tcd-utils is not linked > in a very precise way to xtide verson/release? I even hope that > some day they are split. Well, xtide<->tcd-utils versioning splitting is allowed, there is no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review