Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-21 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Some more comments: > * tideEditor needs to have a variable HFILE_PATH set (I guess for > harmonic files localization?). So it certainly requires an /etc/profile.d > file. > > it also certainly requires a .desktop and icon. profile files and desktop files are useless for tideEditor because: * HFILE_PATH should be under wher user has write access (For example, HFILE_PATH=/usr/share/xtide/harminocs-????.tcd tideEditor immediately exits). * tideEditor surely requires HFILE_PATH environ. With no HFILE_PATH environ, this cannot be launched. > * xttpd certainly would benefit from an init script. Regarding xttpd, could > you please look at some basic security issues, like which user the daemon > runs at. It would certainly make sense to put xttpd in another package, it > is really a different beast from xtide. Currently I am checking debian's script. (In reply to comment #12) > > Well, before fixing this, will you tell me how do you think of > > A. libtcd and tcd-utils release numbering (0<->1) > libtcd 0., tcd-utils directly the release number Well, when I directly use release number, i.e. tcd-utils: 1.3.7-1 2 3 4 5 ... xtide versioning become 2.9-dev 0.1.dev 0.2.dev.. 0.3.dev.. 0.4.dev.. (then formal release) 5 (suddenly jump) > > B. libtcd.so share object loading problem > > It works when doing things by hand, I'll try a rpmbuild. I will try preload > > > C. soname versioning > > Begin with 0 for soname and 0.0.0 for library. Well, for now I will apply this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review