[Bug 580554] Review Request: ghc-packedstring - A packedstring library for Haskell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580554

Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-haskell-list@redhat.
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-08 10:09:20 EDT ---
$ rpmlint -iv ghc-packedstring.spec
../SRPMS/ghc-packedstring-0.1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
../RPMS/i686/ghc-packedstring-*

ghc-packedstring.src: I: checking
ghc-packedstring.i686: I: checking
ghc-packedstring.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-packedstring.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
The binary declares the stack as executable.  Executable stack is usually an
error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar
constructs which uses code on the stack.  One common source for needlessly
executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't
define a proper .note.GNU-stack section.

ghc-packedstring-devel.i686: I: checking
ghc-packedstring-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-packedstring-doc.i686: I: checking
ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: I: checking
ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-packedstring-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.

Successful Koji builds for F-13 and F-14, respectively:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2102529
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2102526

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]