Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580554 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-08 10:09:20 EDT --- $ rpmlint -iv ghc-packedstring.spec ../SRPMS/ghc-packedstring-0.1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/i686/ghc-packedstring-* ghc-packedstring.src: I: checking ghc-packedstring.i686: I: checking ghc-packedstring.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-packedstring.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't define a proper .note.GNU-stack section. ghc-packedstring-devel.i686: I: checking ghc-packedstring-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-packedstring-doc.i686: I: checking ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: I: checking ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-packedstring-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-packedstring-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/packedstring-0.1.0.1/libHSpackedstring-0.1.0.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F-13 and F-14, respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2102529 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2102526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review