Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-21 07:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > If I understand well, libtcd is needed for tcd-utils, and tcd-utils > is needed to create the harmonics*.tcd required by xtide at > runtime. Yes. Surely as you said. > The sane thing would be a packaging of libtcd in his own tarball > upstream. Could it be possible to convince upstream? Well, upstream used to distribute libtcd package, however upstream seems to have stopped it perhaps because it is convenient? Well, upstream distribute harminocs*.tcd binary directory. If using it tcd-utils is not needed for xtide, however, I think including binaries such as some data should be avoid if it is possible. > > In the mean time, with the current upstream organization, I think that > the 3 must be packaged together. Umm, you also think so? Well, actually "all in once" srpm and spec are http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xtide-unified.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xtide-2.9-0.2.dev20061015.src.rpm ( For a moment I changed spec file's name so that you can browser another xtide.spec file (not unified version) and srpm under http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review