Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211629 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-10-21 06:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I believe that is enough, > I do not think it's enough to have a runtime exposed license. Consider if a > binary is violating a licence or law, users building from source don't have a > chance to check in adance to running the application. > > Running the application already would be lawful, may-be even > untarring/downloading the tarball could be considered lawful. > > Woops, poor choice of words, I didn't mean to suggest that the menu item mentioned in comment 9 is enough, what I meant is that the md5sum check is enough to proof that it is unmodified from upstream. To be able to make the license situation clear to the end user (and to make clear where to get the source for the tos image) the readme I describe in comment #10 must be added. Once that readme is in place I believe things are good to go (legally, I still need todo a review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review