Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566878 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-07 10:14:51 EDT --- > > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines > > > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > > -- This and above : The source tar has a COPYING file containing the GPLv3 in > it. Please clarify the license? > > MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > > > If the license is not Beerware and is GPLv3 as in COPYING, it must be included > in %doc > hi, Requesting fedora-legal to look at this once please? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review