[Bug 579230] Review Request: upnp-inspector - UPnP Device and Service analyzer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579230

--- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-06 16:47:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> [+]:The program starts correctly  (unfortunately I don't have a DLNA so I can't
> check more in depth)

Fedora already contains UPnP servers, controllers and renderers. You can check
if upnp-inspector is working fine using, for example, mediatomb (a UPnP server)
and gstreamer (a UPnP renderer and a server).

(In reply to comment #3)
> > > *Package doesn't contain man pages and there's no online help in the
> > > application: consider to work with upstream to add man pages (or doc in the
> > > help menu of the program)    
> > 
> > Debian has a manpage available:
> > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/upnp-inspector/0.2.2+dfsg-2
> > 
> > I can use that and nag upstream about providing it themselves :-)
> 
> This is just a SHOULD item, so I think the package could be approved without
> it.
> Do you think it is worth to include that doc in this package?    

I think that that man page is better than nothing. I'll add it to the package
but I think I won't have the required time until next weekend.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]