Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211629 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-21 05:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > If itsn't feasible with reasonanble effort to buit the EmuTOS image from source > (and it sounds like it isn't), then keeping the tos image in the hatari srpm is > fine with me. No disagreement at this point, but ... (In reply to comment #9) > BTW, running Hatari, inside the emulated Atari ST you boot EmuTOS. Using the > appropriate menu item (Desk->Desktop Info...) you get appropriate copyright and > licence statement. > > I don't know if this is enough. No it isn't. In general we need a legally valid license as part of the source. A document/file or describing this files copyright/license situation, also containing a link to where to download the sources, would appear sufficent to me, but IANAL. Another alternative would be to move this tos.img outside of hatari's source tarball and to use a second SourceX URL inside of the *.spec, pointing to the original sites and documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review