Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572512 --- Comment #23 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-04-06 12:23:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > I think this packaging gluegen is a bit difficult, jogl can not work with all > > versions of gluegen(maybe only a special svn revision of gluegen can work well > > with jogl 1.11a). > > > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 > > > > Packaging jogl is also difficult, maybe we should add some patches to build > > jogl without building bundled gluegen. > > > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 > This version of gluegen works with JOGL. After this time I have figured out > that is not possible to make JOGL without gluegen (gluegen was created by the > same upstream of JOGL just to to make JOGL more "flexible" in the build > process). >Patch JOGL to build without gluegem may require rewrite great amount of code. This is a true obstructer for getting jogl and gluegen approved in fedora and other linux distributions and also the reason why #439627 and #439630 were dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review