[Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765

--- Comment #8 from Carl Byington <carl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-05 16:58:51 EDT ---
exit in library - yes, that seems to be the way they wrote the code, and I
don't see that changing since there are a LOT of such calls.

data files license - the amber and tripos data files are public domain, and
used in a many other chemistry packages. I will check with upstream, but I
doubt there is a more explicit license.

I added a bit of description for the libghemical package. 

Removed unnecessary build-requires.

rpmlint undefined-non-weak-symbol vs. unused-direct-shlib-dependency : for an
example, if we don't add -ldl, then we get dlopen as an
undefined-non-weak-symbol. If we do add -ldl, we get
unused-direct-shlib-dependency for dlopen.so. I have opted to prevent the
undefined-non-weak-symbol errors.

The upstream autoconf packaging does not seem to pickup the proper mpqc
libraries, unless we override 'make LIBS=', which overrides everything. Unless
we want to redo the whole autoconf package, overriding LIBS= seems to work.

http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical.spec
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical-2.99.1-13.fc12.src.rpm   
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2096296

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]