Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hatari - An Atari ST emulator suitable for playing games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211629 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan@xxxxxxxxx 2006-10-21 03:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > AFAIK that is a free GPL tos replacement (am I right Andrea?), but that does > have a seperate upstream and thus should really be packaged seperately from its > own upstream and then Required by this package, Andrea can you make a seperate > package for this? As Hans noted, that is not an original Atari ST TOS image. It is an EmuTOS image supplied with the source archive of Hatari. EmuTOS is GPL'ed too. Please see: http://emutos.sourceforge.net/ I could do a separate package for EmuTOS using the already compiled ROM's. But I don't think that is the preferred way. If you wish a package compiled from sources, it goes beyond my current skills, as it requires build dependencies that are not packaged in Fedora (the cross-mint-gcc toolchain from the sparemint project) and that are only tested to work on old RH 7.0/8.0 and based on old gcc 2.95. If you choose to leave it along with hatari, would it be enough to put a notice in the description filed of the RPM to state that EmuTOS is included and what licence it has? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review