Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579259 Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-04 05:04:17 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 2fb38adfb9415721496eeb8b552cc905 UNIVERSAL-ref-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2093234 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no serious complaints: perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.src: I: checking perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multimethod -> multimedia, multifaceted, multicolored perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US builtin -> built in, built-in, built perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/UNIVERSAL-ref (timeout 10 seconds) perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JJ/JJORE/UNIVERSAL-ref-0.12.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.x86_64: I: checking perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multimethod -> multimedia, multifaceted, multicolored perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US builtin -> built in, built-in, built perl-UNIVERSAL-ref.x86_64: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/UNIVERSAL-ref (timeout 10 seconds) perl-UNIVERSAL-ref-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking perl-UNIVERSAL-ref-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/UNIVERSAL-ref (timeout 10 seconds) perl-UNIVERSAL-ref-tests.x86_64: I: checking perl-UNIVERSAL-ref-tests.x86_64: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/UNIVERSAL-ref (timeout 10 seconds) perl-UNIVERSAL-ref-tests.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(UNIVERSAL::ref) = 0.12 perl-UNIVERSAL-ref = 0.12-1.fc13 perl-UNIVERSAL-ref(x86-64) = 0.12-1.fc13 = libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl(B) perl(B::Utils) perl(B::Utils) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(XSLoader) + %check is present and all tests pass. t/basic.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.08 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review