Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211623 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2006-10-20 19:59 EST ------- > And upstreams of libtcd and xtide are different...... No, David Flater is the maintainer of both. > In this html, upstream considers the case that people want to > seperate libtcd. Because libtcd and everything around TCD is in the PD, while xtide is GPL. Hence libtcd comes with an own configure script, which makes it possible to build the library separately. Still, upstream does not ship a shared library, maybe never will do so. [...] How does the DSO versioning scheme you've invented relate to libtcd's versioning scheme? Where do you see that libtcd 2.0 and 2.1 are incompatible? With every update of xtide, will you check whether the included libtcd contains changes? And then split it off, build the library packages first, and only then build utils and xtide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review