Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 --- Comment #20 from Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@xxxxxx> 2010-03-30 04:54:22 EDT --- Shortly after this comment a new release appeard: http://code.entropywave.com/2010/03/orc-0-4-4-released/ SPEC: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/orc/1/orc.spec SRPM: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/orc/1/orc-0.4.4-1.fc14.src.rpm Corresponding koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2083642 rpmlint shows no errors/warnings for any koji generated file. (In reply to comment #19) > The library sizes are for non-default configurations that are only intended for > embedded use. The standard configuration includes all backends, plus the > parser. The sizes listed here sound reasonable. Sounds good. > The x86-64 testsuite failure is a real bug. I just fixed it in master, and > will be releasing 0.4.4 shortly (todayish?) with the fix (along with a bunch of > other fixes). The koji build is running fine. @kwizart Can you still reproduce the problem on AMD arches? > The powerpc-64 bug appears to be a real bug, and it looks like it happens on > powerpc-32 as well. I'll look into it after the release. Ok. This should not be a problem for us, as ppc is no primary arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review