Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the Scribes text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211242
mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-19 12:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Why are datestamps like this not
> preferred? (There really is no other specific versioning to it...)
There are many cases that a source numbered by date means it is a pre-version
and in that case the VERSION in spec file should have something like
0.%{date}. However, if it is not for this package, it is okay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This package (scribes-templates) is APPROVED by me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review