Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577152 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-27 07:41:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Would you be interested in packaging the whole pyside set? > Yes, that's my plan. Would you be interested in reviewing the whole set? > > BTW, %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor-%{version}/ seems not the right place for > > cmake modules. > This is the place where cmake-aware projects put their arch-specific > configuration [1] (the files may contain references to %{_libdir}, for > example). The directory %{_libdir}/cmake/ is roughly similar to > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ -- both are placed under %{_libdir} for the same reason. > Several KDE packages install files in this directory and Fedora cmake package > recently started owning the directory [2]. > [1] http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes#Packages > [2] > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/cmake/devel/cmake.spec?r1=1.76&r2=1.77 Thanks for clarification. currently fedora doesn't have a packaging guideline according to cmake modules(even a draft), so I'm a little confusion about this, historically cmake package didn't own {_libdir}/cmake and some packages store cmake modules on %{_datadir}/cmake/%{name} (e.g. boost 1.41). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review