Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #15 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-25 08:05:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > As > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREARCHITECTUREINDEPENDENTDATA > /usr/share is arch-dependent files only, so if the files differ between > endianness, the files cannot be under /usr/share. > Also while it seems model files are endian-dependent, I am not sure > if zinnia_convert surely always reproduce the same model file if > the endianness is the same. If the upstream just says > "model file is arch-dependent", it is safer to use %_libdir, not > %prefix/lib. $ find . -name \*ja.model | sort | xargs md5sum 03c61b0424c5fdb96bf0e5f904259d5b ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.i686/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model e29a1670db551246a0ebd076b301f329 ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.ppc/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model e29a1670db551246a0ebd076b301f329 ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.ppc64/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model 03c61b0424c5fdb96bf0e5f904259d5b ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model It seems the model files have the same md5 between ppc and ppc64(also between i686 and x86_64). I'll try to build those file in arm to determine whether those model files are just endian-dependent. debian guys treat those model files as noarch. See http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/tegaki-zinnia-japanese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review