Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #13 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-25 04:45:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, I tried to rebuild this pkg and actually handwriting-ja.model > differs between archs (perhaps endian specific), so this pkg must > not be noarch. > > $ find . -name \*ja.model | sort | xargs md5sum > 03c61b0424c5fdb96bf0e5f904259d5b > ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.i686/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model > e29a1670db551246a0ebd076b301f329 > ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.ppc/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model > e29a1670db551246a0ebd076b301f329 > ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.ppc64/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model > 03c61b0424c5fdb96bf0e5f904259d5b > ./zinnia-tomoe-0.6.0.20080911-1.1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe/handwriting-ja.model > > (note that in Makefile.am in the tarball of this pkg, "modeldir" > is hardcoded as @prefix@/lib/zinnia/model/tomoe , however this > needs fixing because we request that arch-specific pkg must use > %_libdir, not /usr/lib ) Hi Mamoru, Should we install endian-specific files into /usr/lib or /usr/share instead of %{_lib}? Because there are no difference between 32bit and 64bit files, though the files are arch-specific. There are only two types of endian-specific files - little endian and big endian. I need your help, because another package review also has endian-specific files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review