Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2006-10-19 19:10 EST ------- First I would like to thank you to answear this review. I'm not a packager throught i need to be sponsored for packages in FE extras... But... please notice that making a kmod on FE (in general) in the state of the policy is a "perfect double bind" which leads to make schizophrenic packagers. On one hand, kernel modules have to be inside the kernel tree, on the other hand, when they are in development, why integrate them inside a kmod if they are not as good as for the kernel. The kmod aims isn't to make easy updatable kernel module out of the kernel tree because they require this in fact (for their development!?! The choice a user of a ralink wifi chipset has in fact is to use the Ndis scheme based "module" - so why can we ask the vendor of such scheme to develop wifi module for linux ? Wifi users have the choice actually - But they sould have the choice to use linux module too... (when they are avaible - and it is the case for now!) I agree with you the situation isn't satisfaying with the d80211 stack. But make a different kmod for this seems to be more problematic because it deals with versions that different wifi module will use! There is the netdev kernel issue for this specific problem (d80211 stack is in netdev in think?) The compilation problem is more difficult to me. Now it works fine! I expected it was since kernel 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 was released but it seems to be more difficult: So that's the point! Here is the discution with the developper (IvD): http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=15075#15075 People will not be able to update their kernel with the kmod-rt2x00 package nor to compile themselves the rt2x00 package for most of them nor to use an old rt2500 rt2400 rt2570 etc version because they are so buggy on smp and unstable... So the last chance for them is to dual-boot a kernel until it works... (thought this is not satisfaying for me too!) That's all for now - I will try to fix this but i'm not a programmer - i'm just a student in architecture... So your help is welcome! Thx one second time to answear this post! Nicolas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review