[Bug 575485] Review Request: libharu - C library for generating PDF files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575485

--- Comment #2 from Alex Orlandi <nyrk71@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-23 04:29:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hey Alex. I'd be happy to review this for you. 
> 
> OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
> OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
> [...cut...]
> OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
> /usr/sbin
> 
> Issues: 
> 
> 1. The .so files are not quite right here. 
> 
> the .so should be in the devel subpackage. 
> The versioning is odd also, as they have: 
> 
> libhpdf-2.1.0.so instead of libhpdf.so.2.1.0 ?
> 
> I guess it might be ok to have *.so in the devel package and *-2.1.0.so in the
> main pkg?

 - you are right: the .so versioning is odd; anyway I put .so in devel and
-2.1.0 in the main one

> Do any of the demo programs work if you do this?

 - yes, they do (after the modification mentioned above)

> 2. rpmlint says: 
> 
> libharu.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/libharu-2.1.0/README
> [...cut...]
> libharu-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/libharu-devel-2.1.0/CHANGES
> 
> This can be ignored, but you should probibly not include those both in both
> files. 
> The base file should be fine, as thats required by the devel package. 

 - removed CHANGES and README from devel pkg

> libharu-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
> 
> This seems like it might be fallout from the weird library naming. ;( 

 - resolved enabling --enable-debug in configure

> 3. Please don't include the INSTALL file. There is no need to tell people how
> to build the file if they are installing the package. 

 - INSTALL file removed

> 4. Is it worth including the demos in the devel package as doc files?
 - yes, it is :-) Included underd doc/ in devel pkg

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]