[Bug 566962] Review Request: polipo - Lightweight Caching Web Proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566962

--- Comment #20 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-18 15:13:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > $ rpmlint polipo-*.rpm
> > polipo.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/log/polipo
> > 
> > Ghosted, not an issue
> 
> I am not sure, whether this is correct. /var/log/polipo is probably a logfile,
> therefore it is imho wrong to use %conf for it.    

/var/log/polipo is a logfile, so I follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Logfiles to add %ghost %config
to the logfile, I'm not suse if it's the right pattern to package a logfile.


 (In reply to comment #16)
> Fine, UID+GID are created in pre-install.  /var/cache is consistent with FSH
> 
> polipo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/polipo 0750
> 
> I would normally expect that to be 0700 or owned by root
> 
Refer to the squid rpm, /var/cache/polipo should be owned by polipo and have a
non-standard-dir-perm. 
See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1871194&filename=/var/spool/squid


New SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/polipo-1.0.4.1-2.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]