Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574267 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-16 22:12:16 EDT --- So, a couple extra thoughts on this one, as it's a little "weird" given its dual-life status. All of the following directly follow the corresponding bits of perl.spec. I've directly BR'd perl-devel. Modules are installed to "perl" (aka core) dirs vs vendor. Practically, this change has no real impact on F-13+ due to the core/vendor conflation, but it seemed to be a good idea to be consistent. There's some commented-out bits relating to triggering a full re-test using the core perl test suite, as Iain suggested. (I have the perl.spec mods in place to break out the test suite into a perl-tests package, but need to get something up and going so I can make sure it actually works as advertised.) I haven't BR'ed either Test::Pod or Test::Pod::Coverage, as I didn't want to introduce a non-core dependency on a dual-life package. (I'm open to being convinced otherwise, however :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review