Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 --- Comment #26 from Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-13 03:51:26 EST --- Ralf, it's amazing how hard you try to make Fedora an unpleasant place for packagers. Mamoru, I agree, in particular to the doc subpackage. boost-doc, gtkmm24-docs, qt-doc are precedents. For example for gtkmm the generated documentation is also split. Since doxygen documentation can become quite large, it's often useful to have a separate package for it. As noarch package it can save on the mirrors, and it can save space and download time on machines where you need stage as a devel dependency, but are not actively developing against it. For the pkgconfig files: they are working. Yes, requires would be a nicer option, and filing a bug to add them after the package is added is fine. But I take this with the "worse is better" mentality: it's better to have the package in the repository, especially since this is working and just not perfect, and then improve it. But not reason for the unnecessary fuss about minor issues! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review