Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #16 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-12 04:24:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Hi Mamoru, > > Please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560967 > > Regards > I have read the bug, however as Jussi and I already said on this bug, > the new package is "zim" software with language being changed from perl > to python, not more or less ( I know some other applications which > changes the language they use, like C -> python, ruby -> perl, etc...) > Also "pyzim" or "python-zim" is just wrong because this naming usually > means that this package is some module of python (like pygtk2), while > is actually one "application". I highly agree with you, however the original Zim maintainer didn't want to retire Zim. Shall we talk with Chris to retire Zim before this package is proved? Conflicting package names, even if they differ by case alone, are not allowed in fedora. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review