Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: harminv - Program and library for solving the harmonic inversion problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210824 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-17 22:14 EST ------- Hello: I saw that you added blas-devel, lapack-devel to BuildRequires to fix x86_64 compilation problem. However this is incorrect because: on i386: Requires: libatlas.so.3 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcblas.so.3 libf77blas.so.3 libgcc_s.so.1 libgfortran.so.1 libharminv.so.2 liblapack.so.3 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH) Processing files: harminv-devel-1.3.1-7.fc6 on x86_64: Requires: libblas.so.3()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgfortran.so.1()(64bit) libharminv.so.2()(64bit) liblapack.so.3()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ... linkage is different between i386/ppc and x86_64. The main problem is not BuildRequires. It is that on x86/64 the needed libraries are under /usr/lib64/atlas, not under /usr/lib/atlas . Please fix the linkage so that harminv is linked against the same libraries on i386/ppc & x86_64. Then I think adding blas-devel, lapack-devel is not needed (and should be avoided for this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review