Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-17 17:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) [...] > I've submitted a bug to upstream asking them to correct the > documentation in the next release. In the mean time, is it Fedora's (and thus > ours as the packagers) responsibility to fix silly things like forgetting to > bump version numbers in your documentation? Obviously some quick command-line > perl will do the job nicely in %pre... what is everyone's feeling on the > subject? I think a packager is not obliged but he should at least poke the upstream about that. Of course sending upstream a patch is the best solution. > Also, I now echo the contents of README.RPM upon package install to let users > know about the next step required to initialize their tripwire database. I don't think this is the best idea, but, as long as it's non-interactive, I don't mind. I'll take this review, because I'm interested in keeping this package in Fedora. I still use it on some servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review