[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086

--- Comment #4 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-10 07:56:00 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hello Chen Lei!
> thanks for your comments:
> 1) What do you mean "add subpackage info after %description"? Would you mind
> writing a small example?
> (ie: 
> %package devel
> Summary: Headers for VXL library
> Group:  Development/Libraries
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> %description devel
> You should install this package if you would like to
> develop code based on VXL.
> -> Here I think you should add some more text to clarify <-
> )

It's not error, just a spec file standard. You see almost all spec files add
subpackage info after %description, follow standard will increase the
readability of spec file.

See
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/glibc/devel/glibc.spec?revision=1.430&view=markup


> 2) As for the bundled libs:
> - I've already removed jpeg png zlib tiff geotiff mpeg2
> - v3p/netlib dependency not removed because of heavily modifications
> - v3p/dcmtk: it exists an rpm package at http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en but
> there is none in yum and neither there is a review request. Should we try to
> add it as well?
> - All of the following libraries are being switched off:
> -DBUILD_OXL:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_GEOMETRY:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_IMAGING:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_NUMERICS:BOOL=ON \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_PROBABILITY:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_SERIALISATION:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_UTILITIES:BOOL=OFF \
>  -DBUILD_CORE_VIDEO:BOOL=OFF \
> because the main intent for this package was to allow InsightToolkit (which is
> blocked by this package review), my idea to speed up the approval was to
> disable these functionalities as they are not used in Insight Toolkit and
> require a significant effort to be decoupled and packaged as well.
> If you can help in packaging and enabling these libraries, I would be more than
We should packaging those libs, I can also help you to package some of them.
Howerver, if I try to package those libs, I'll need some others to review my
packages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]