Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348 Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, | |metherid@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-09 20:40:26 EST --- I was working on a package too, but didn't consider it ready for Fedora yet. I was working with upstream while this was submitted without contacting or following upstream. That's a stupid waste of work. Some of my work and review got upstreamed, but please take what you can use from the spec at http://bitbucket.org/kiilerix/dreampie-rpm/src/tip/dreampie.spec - though there isn't much to take except these comments: I would say that one file as LGPLv2+ (which is compatible with and thus relicensable to GPLv3) isn't worth mentioning in the license field. And there are other files with other compatible licenses. Group: It is not a lib but more like Development/Tools The package requires pygtk2-libglade, not just pygtk2 Man pages should be %doc And finally and the reason I got stalled: I think the use of zip files is a show-stopper. It is a ugly hack and doesn't give the transparency we like in Fedora packaging. The py2 files should be installed as plain py files, and the py3 files moved to a py3 subpackage on the archs where it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review