Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-17 13:41 EST ------- Reply out of order: (In reply to comment #1) > Its clear now that gspca will be coming in future releases of upstream kernel. Well, "so maybe one day will go in the kernel" doesn't sound as if there are actual plans to work on the integration. A more clear statement would be much more helpful. > what you think about this information? Is this sufficient or need more? I can forward it to FESCo and we can discuss it. I suppose it's enough to get some people rise their hands for "we allow this module in Extras". But there will also be some people that won't like this. I already know one particular member that will say "this is not enough, I don't want this module in extras". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review