Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kwizart@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-08 17:22:03 EST --- There are several problems with this package. - The testsuite is failing * Most problem seems related to libtool not patched to use /usr/lib64 by default, so it could be easier to use autoreconf -vif * One test is failing because of assembler code (on F-12 x86_64 AMD64) - There is still rpath on produced binaries (at least on x86_64) by disabled with autoreconf - building docs produce errors. (missing BR ?) - It's usually better to install with install -p to prevents timestamp change for headers, doing like: make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" - rpmlint on installed file isn't quiet: rpmlint orc orc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 floor orc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 sqrtf orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liborc-pixel-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liborc-pixel-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 orc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liborc-float-0.4.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 -> liborc misses -lm at link time. - Contradiction with README: - Q: How big is the Orc library? A: Compiled with only one target (SSE), the library size is about 86 kB uncompressed, or 30 kB compressed. The goal is to keep the uncompressed size under about 100 kB. # ls -alh /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 293K mars 8 23:03 /usr/lib64/liborc-0.4.so.0.0.0 Do we know if this library grown abnormally or that was expected and the README need to be corrected ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review