Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554243 --- Comment #10 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-08 02:36:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > I can review them if Matthias can't. > > > > Hi Peter, thanks for the offer, but are you a sponsor? Since this is Graeme's > > first package, he has to be reviewed by a sponsor, otherwise I would have > > reviewed this myself long ago. That was why Matthias volunteered (since he is > > a sponsor). > > The reviewer and sponsor are generally different people. The sponsor helps > Graeme through the process that the reviewer completes. I would ask the list > for help. That's not my understanding: "The Reviewer can be any Fedora account holder, who is a member of the packager group. There is one exception: If it is the first package of a Contributor, the Reviewer must be a Sponsor." from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer but if others are OK with it, I'm fine with the sponsor doing the final sign-off, as I'm keen to get this package updated ASAP. > Also as mentioned by Jason each package will need to be split out into a > separate review as each package needs to go through the following guidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines and then have a CVS > request which will confuse things as to what package needs what fixed. See bug > 553717 as an example. I understand, but I think that because of the package interdependencies that it makes sense to review this as a single package. How about opening up separate bugs for each tarball, but doing the main review/discussion (at least initially) in one bug to allow cross-package issues to be discussed in one plac?. Then the final review checklist can be posted to the relevant bug and the CVS request done in the separate bug. > Finally if its just a rename you can do a rename request for the package which > is quicker. See 517300 for an example. Graeme will still need a sponsor for > that. I think a full review is in order here because of the time since the last update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review