[Bug 225776] Merge Review: gamin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225776

--- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-04 18:55:37 EST ---
rpm -qp --requires  gamin-python-0.1.10-7.fc14.x86_64.rpm
gives
/usr/bin/python
gamin = 0.1.10-7.fc14
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libgamin-1.so.0()(64bit)
python(abi) = 2.6
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1


Question 1: Is it really intended to have /usr/bin/python in the list of
dependencies ? python(abi) = 2.6 should be enough, shouldn't it ?

Question 2: In addition to that, rpmlint is quite unhappy with the scripts
placed below /usr/share/doc/gamin-python-0.1.10, all of the python ones are
flagged as having spurious-executable-perm and doc-file-dependency on
/usr/bin/python. I guess we should ignore those warnings as the very reason of
the package is to provide those scripts. Right ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]