Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554260 --- Comment #8 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-03 22:33:43 EST --- rpmlint output: ibus-table-xingma.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) struct -> strict, strut, struck ibus-table-xingma.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ibus-table-stroke5 ibus-table-xingma.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ibus-table-wubi ibus-table-xingma.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ibus-table-xinhua ibus-table-xingma.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ibus-table-zhengma 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) struct -> strict, strut, struck ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.0.20100111-3.fc13 ['1.2.0.20100111-3.fc12', '1.2.0.20100111-3'] ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: self-obsoletion ibus-table-stroke5 <= 1.2.0.20100111 obsoletes ibus-table-stroke5 ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: self-obsoletion ibus-table-wubi <= 1.2.0.20100111 obsoletes ibus-table-wubi ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: self-obsoletion ibus-table-xinhua <= 1.2.0.20100111 obsoletes ibus-table-xinhua ibus-table-xingma.noarch: W: self-obsoletion ibus-table-zhengma <= 1.2.0.20100111 obsoletes ibus-table-zhengma 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Things to fix: 1. Spelling error in summary 2. I've provides a patch to fix the provide/obsolete error. 3. Remove dist tag in changelog Otherwise looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review