Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wallpapoz - Gnome Multi Backgrounds and Wallpapers Configuration Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210467 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-10-16 13:38 EST ------- >* I should report upstream about installation process issue > and wait for upstream's reaction before this package is > approved? Until upstreamer fixes > install.py, you won't approve this package? Sorry I wasn't clear there. I was hoping you could ping upstream about the issue, and perhaps wait a day or two to see if they were going to fix it quickly. If not, I would say go ahead and import and fix it later when they do upstream. >* I should use %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ , not >%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps for %icondir macro? No, this is not a blocker either... I think the macros make the spec file less readable, but there is not a hard rule against them. I will go ahead and APPROVE this package now, but you might want to see if upstream will quickly fix the install.py issues before importing (a few days?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review