Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-15 22:12 EST ------- I don't really feel competent to review mono packages, but here are a few generic comments: Is the name of the package "monotools" or "mono-tools"? The URL seems to be incorrect. It's up to you whether you separate BuildRequires: with spaces or commas, but you should be consistent. The %description is a bit content-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review