Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #9 from Chess Griffin <chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-26 15:40:37 EST --- Here are my updated SPEC and SRPM: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2.spec http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2-0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm This builds ok in mock and for dist-f12, dist-f13, and dist-f14 in Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2016772 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2016789 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2016800 I added a patch to fix a DSO Linking issue. I will send this patch upstream if it looks ok to reviewers, and I'll also add a comment to that effect (if it's not accepted upstream). John, thanks for your offer and I would definitely appreciate your input and co-maintainership. I am not yet an approved packager/maintainer and have been unable to find the time to do some thorough reviews. I've packaged stuff for other distros and also FreeBSD, so while RPM packaging is different, of course, I have an understanding of how packaging works in general. So working with a co-maintainer would be good training. :-) I also agree that orage should not be a Require. I use tint2 with openbox and other WM's and would hate to see orage pulled in by default. It's also like the default menus entries in fluxbox -- those aren't pulled in, AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review