Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #54 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-23 23:08:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #52) > (In reply to comment #51) > > > Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will that > > come as part of the jogl package? > I'm going to build a separated javadock package. > We already have this functional gluegen package: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem > with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his > build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this initial > step and discard it. It's definitely not. You must using a git or svn version of gluegen. Maybe you need wrote some patches for gluegen to let jogl 1.1.1a build success with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review