Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libctl - Guile-based support for flexible control files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210781 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-14 23:53 EST ------- Well, moving things to a directory is a reasonable solution. I guess the question is whether /usr/include/ctl is really any better than /usr/include/ctl.h and whether it's worth the trouble at all. I mean, every downstream package will need work to accommodate. And normally I wouldn't bring it up at all, except that there has been plenty of discussion about this issue recently. It's easy to check to see if anything else owns the file: repoquery --whatprovides /usr/include/ctl.h which shows that indeed nothing owns it. (I had checked this earlier.) I guess that putting things in a directory under /usr/include is conceptually quite clean and should be adopted by more packages. There shouldn't be any objections as long as it's easy to fix the dependent packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review