Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-14 23:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Andrew, is there any chance you'd like to co-maintain this with Thomas? I'm > willing to vouch for your review and do the sponsor dance. OK, sounds good. > As an aside: this works with libgcj and GNU classpath? Wow. Truly free java > really is getting there, isn't it? Yes, it works on FC-6 libgcj. We're making good progress on our AWT and Swing implementations. (In reply to comment #23) > Are you sure you don't want to split out all those jars? Yes, it means more work > for you as a packager of megamek, but it's less work the next time anyone needs > any of those packages. I'd prefer to wait until a need for these jars as separate packages is discovered. They're all tiny bits of code; introducing five new packages for them seems heavy-handed. If you can show me another upstream project that needs any of these bits of code, I'll separate them out, but I've looked and I can't find any. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review