Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #37 from Klaus Grue <grue@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-22 17:36:41 EST --- > Hi, this time: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2005834 The build log is bad news. Contrary to the issues that have been solved thanks to your help, this bug may be difficult to locate. So I need to reproduce the bug on my own machine. Could I ask you for one more favour: to try to build for x86_64 without building for i686? It would be a great help to know if the problem is related to the i686 build. Using mock, I have built the following on my fc11 machine: fc11/x86_64 fc11/i586 fc12/x86_64 fc12/i686 Unfortunately, they all build without errors, so I have not managed to reproduce the bug that way. My fc11 has no mock config file for fc11/i686, so I have not tried that. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support it looks as if fc11 supports i586 and fc12 supports i686. But http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2005834 points to these architectures: * buildArch (logiweb-0.2.8-6.fc11.src.rpm, x86_64) (canceled) * buildArch (logiweb-0.2.8-6.fc11.src.rpm, i686) (failed) So it seems that one can build for i686 on fc11 somehow. Do you happen to know where to get a fc11/i686 mock config file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review