Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-20 14:37:35 EST --- Review of perl-Log-Any, February 20th. yes: rpmlint. $ rpmlint perl-Log-Any.spec \ ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Log-Any-0.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm \ ../SRPMS/perl-Log-Any-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. yes: package name good for perl. yes: .spec file name good. yes: meets pkg guidelines. yes: spec has gpl+ or Artistic. yes: yes source is same as perl so as above. yes: english .spec file. yes: .spec is legible. yes: matches upstream. $ md5sum Log-Any-0.11.tar.gz SOURCES/Log-Any-0.11.tar.gz 9186d94ee2ae7cada408fc5faf86d975 Log-Any-0.11.tar.gz 9186d94ee2ae7cada408fc5faf86d975 SOURCES/Log-Any-0.11.tar.gz yes: compiles fine. yes: buildrequires sane. yes: no locale. yes: no shared libs. yes: no system libs. yes: not relocatable. yes: Owns all directories. yes: no duplicates. yes: %clean actually cleans. yes: No large docs. yes: No -devel package. yes: no pkgconfig yes: no sub-packages. yes: no gui. yes: does not own directories from other packages. yes: %install rm -rf first. yes: UTF8 Builds in mock-rawhide (F14!) Basically a very simple cpanspec generated package. APPROVED. Steve p.s. (I've got a perl module perl-VOMS-Lite, up for review if you have time to review.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review