Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566819 --- Comment #2 from Jan F. Chadima <jchadima@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-19 17:55:58 EST --- Subdirectory libhtp/ seems to be correctly licensed as GPLv2 v exception for compatibility with any FLOSS license. However, code in subdirectory src/ has no comments about licensing and there doesn't seem to be any README explaining licensing. Even worse, some files have just files (e.g., src/suricata.c) have this /* Copyright (c) 2008 Victor Julien <victor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> */ which is IMHO bad for Fedora. Please, consider the legal status of this package and whether there is some way how make this package acceptable without contacting the upstream, or whether it has to be fixed by the original author. Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review