Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558535 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2010-02-19 12:24:42 EST --- Hello Manfred, I will do the reviews and sponsor you. At first, please, create individual review requests for spooles, ccx and cgx (and libSNL), they are separate components and must be viewed separately. The "depends on" and "blocks" fields can be used to create their hierarchy. On first view the spooles spec file looks good, only the static subpackage should be dropped in Fedora (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries). The ccx spec looks good too. cgx - libSNL must be again packaged separately (I expect that it exists somewhere as a tar archive) and system-wide glut must be used instead of the included copy. And if you have any question, don't hesitate to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review