Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Andy Cress <arcress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #23 from Andy Cress <arcress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-16 14:02:42 EST --- Yes, I am the maintainer. OK, the %define no longer have a purpose, that makes sense. The package can be installed on an IPMI-enabled system, or on a non-IPMI system to be used as a remote client. the only difference would be that the initial IPMI data would not be gathered on a non-IPMI client. Detecting whether or not a system is IPMI-enabled (has an IPMI Management Controller) is done by running any ipmiutil command to see if it can find the interface. No changes are made to the IPMI configuration. The software does already fold all functions into one meta-command as you mention, and the other commands had previously been changed to scripts that just invoke the one command method. They were provided in ipmiutil-2.1.0 as a back-compatible path for previously deployed user scripts. But, it is time to wean the users off of the old scripts, and I'll start that for ipmiutil-2.6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review