Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565486 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-15 19:47:17 EST --- package name: looks fine to me spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok readable: ok upstream sources: the download instructions don't seem to work. When I go there, I get 'No such tree SHA1 was found' buildable: ok ExcludeArch: none, ok BuildRequires: ok locales: none, ok shared libs: none, ok system libs: none, ok relocatable: no directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: none, ok %doc content: ok headers: none, ok static libs: none, ok pkgconfig: ok shared libs: none, ok devel dependencies: ok libtool archives: ok gui app: none, ok directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: fix the download instructions, everything else is looking great -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review