Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565313 --- Comment #2 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-15 03:51:46 EST --- This is intended for embedded development targeting "bare metal", e.g., microcontrollers, which is why it is "arm-none-eabi" rather than "arm-something-linux". It also should be usable for systems running non-Linux operating systems that are EABI compliant, provided that the user obtains the appropriate headers and libraries. The description in the SPEC doesn't say this because I kept the generic description from the avr-binutils and arm-gp2x-linux binutils, but perhaps it is justifiable to add a paragraph explaining that it is for embedded/bare metal use. I'm working on packaging gcc, gdb, and newlib, but binutils will need to be in the package collection before I can submit them for review. (Otherwise they would fail to build due to the binutils dependency.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review