Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-14 15:05:18 EST --- Thanks. (In reply to comment #19) > > * Directory ownership fixed Still there are issues. Please install all the generated packages. Then uninstall them. You will be left with these empty directories /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/ /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Debian/ /usr/share/dpkg/ That is because their subdirectories are not owned. And rpm does not remove non-empty directories during uninstallation. An example of a way to fix this is to change the lines %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian/Dselect/*.pm to %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian/ then you won't have this problem. Similarly for the other directories. Beware though, %{_datadir}/dpkg/ is used by both the main package and the dselect package so it needs to be handled carefully. Also, you have these two lines under %files: %dir %{_datarootdir}/dpkg %dir %{_datadir}/dpkg As far as I know, %{_datarootdir} and %{_datadir} both point to /usr/share. There is no need to list the same directory twice in the %files listings. I prefer using either one notation or the other. > > * Please provide some pointers on how i can make the build more verbose. > Just pass --disable-silent-rules to configure. ! One last thing: Changing install -m0644 to install -pm0644 will preserve timestamps. No big deal though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review