Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-13 14:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent projects, and it's > for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke. IMHO this is avoiding future trouble. > I also consulted the packaging commitee and most agree on that (but we were > only 5 out of 10 present). 3/10 is hardly a majority. > I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to headers, > if the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take > the header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future > extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source > and not the package. Do you agree? No, I don't, but I'm not going to hold this up. If anyone has some issues later, I'll tell them to take it up with you four. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review