Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559699 --- Comment #6 from Nuno Santos <nsantos@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-11 12:05:34 EST --- Fabio, please find updated SRPM and specfile at the same URLs: SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/~nsantos/qpid-cpp-0.5.829175-4.fc13.src.rpm spec: http://people.redhat.com/~nsantos/qpid-cpp.spec I put the patches back in, it's generating the correct version of .so now. Regarding the version, this is 0.5.829175-4, which is higher than what was in rawhide before (qpidc-0.5.819819-1.fc13), and the same codebase but a revision higher than what's in F12 (qpidc-0.5.829175-3.fc12). I fixed most of the warnings from rpmlint (except for "no-documentation", etc), but these errors are still present (explanations for each are inline): * qpid-cpp-server.i686: E: non-readable /var/lib/qpidd/qpidd.sasldb 0600 - this is supposed to non-readble * qpid-cpp-server-store.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio - there is no explicit lib dependency, there is a requires for a package named libaio: "Requires: libaio" (line 281) * qpid-cpp-server-store.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/rhm 0775 - supposed to have those permissions * ruby-qmf.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/qmfengine.so ['/builddir/build/BUILD/qpidc-0.5.829175/cpp/src/.libs'] - not sure why it's complaining, I'm using the standard ruby_sitelib and ruby_sitearch macros, not hardcoding any path Nuno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review