Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openpbx - The truly open source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210025 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-13 07:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > > Finally, rpmlint complains of dangling relative symlinks and > 'only-non-binary-in-usr-lib' because of the foo.so symlinks in the > -devel package. I'm not entirely sure what its problem is there, but > I don't see anything wrong. Please advise. I think that the dangling relative symlinks are because "libfoo.so" is a symlink to "libfoo.so.0.0.0" but the soname embedded in the library is "libfoo.so.0". RPM detects the soname and adds a "Requires: libfoo.so.0" to the -devel package, so without the manual "Requires: openpbx = %{version}-%{release}" installing the -devel package wouldn't pull in the main package. The proper fix would be to figure out why libtool is installing the libs in this way. The quick fix would be to delete and recreate the "libfoo.so" symlink after "make install" does it's thing. I think that something like the following should fix it: for l in libopenpbx.so libedit.so libopbxilbc.so libopbxjb.so do rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/openpbx.org/$l ln -s $l.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/openpbx.org/$l done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review